Kilauea Mount Etna Mount Yasur Mount Nyiragongo and Nyamuragira Piton de la Fournaise Erta Ale. Mind Mapping training, courses, information software from Illumine Training leading Mind Map specialists UK and worldwide Buzan Mind Map workshops. Which Best Suits Your Needs SCORM vs Tin Can vs AICC How have the e Learning standards evolved over the years Which one has the most potential Which one provides better insights into learners activityBrief overview, pros, cons and a comparative chart in this article. In the modern world of e Learning, instructional designers have to take care of different aspects of course delivery. At some point in the past, it used to be all about engaging content, now its as much about performance and activity tracking, analysis and feedback. The tracking tools and technologies, as well as smooth interoperability between various LMSs, seem to be of utmost importance to teachers and content authors across the globe. As any well developed industry, e Learning has embraced standardization and technical arrangements that enable easy content distribution and smart metrics. The pioneering SCORM and AICC formats were first introduced some 1. Scorm 2004 Package Store' title='Scorm 2004 Package Store' />When Tin Can aka Experience API, or x. API came on the scene, many experts predicted the inevitable deterioration of SCORM. Some have actually pronounced the standard dead yet it looks pretty much alive, employed by the majority of customers and organizations. In this posting, I intend to provide a quick overview of AICC HACP, SCORM 1. API, their advantages, disadvantages and prospects. AICC HACPThe AICC standard from Aviation Industry Computer Based Training Committee was an early bird in the world of e Learning technology. Its initial specifications date back to the 1. AICCs CMI Guidelines for Interoperability was, in fact, the first widely recognized standard for interoperability between content and LMS. In 1. 99. 8 the AICC standard added a web interface called HACP HTTP based AICCCMI Protocol. Like SCORM, AICC has gone through several revisions and updates. Apparently, AICC had a hard time keeping pace with the evolving market, yet some of its fundamentals still work in the modern environment. As the acronym suggests, the standard stems from aviation industry training that focused heavily on images and simulations. Years passed, and the AICC standards have ultimately helped LMS providers to deliver video content and simulations on mobile devices. The HACP protocol has some unique features that even make it preferable to SCORM in specific cases. Since HACP is HTTP based, it avoids cross domain scripting issues typical for SCORMs ECMAScript based communication. Known for its browser security limitations, SCORM prohibits communication between content served from one domain and an LMS served from another domain. AICC HACP is more flexible in this regard, offering a handy alternative in ambiguous deployment scenarios. Its also worth mentioning that SCORM has actually borrowed certain aspects from AICC. For instance, the run time communication in SCORM refers to AICCs previous work. In recent years, AICC experts have been working on a new specification CMI 5 Computer Managed Instruction. The updated standard adds support for EMCAScript based data exchange and more SCORM features, yet we have to admit AICC is irrevocably dropping off the industry radar. Pros. Allows content to be hosted on a separate server. Supports secure HTTPS data transfers. Cons. Out of date and mostly abandoned by most e Learning providers. Limited functionality and lack of progress tracking capabilities. Requires multiple operations to remove data from the string returned by the server. SCORM 1. 2 and 2. Sharable Content Object Reference Model SCORM is a suite of e Learning specifications developed by the Advanced Distributed Learning ADL Initiative. SCORM defines communication between client side content and an LMS. It also stipulates the way content is packaged into a Package Interchange Format ZIP archive. SCORM 1. 2 was the first widely used edition that is still supported by most LMSs. Before the introduction of SCORM, integrating courses with a delivery framework was a rather daunting task unless the content was tailored to a specific platform. The situation entailed time consuming customization and prohibitive deployment costs. In this sense, the SCORM specification made a radical change. SCORM 1. 2 neglects content sequencing by a runtime service, following the conjecture that the learner would be free to pick any part of the course. However, it delivers a solid specification for content packaging and migration between systems. The latest version of the standard is SCORM 2. It introduced sequencing, a set of rules that defines the order of content objects to be viewed by a learner. In other words, the standard restricts learners experience to a specified set of paths throughout the material. SCORM 2. 00. 4 also allows users to bookmark certain milestones as they make progress, and store achieved test scores. To learn more about SCORM 1. Regretfully, SCORM doesnt address all the challenges of a modern learning enterprise. It doesnt define how tracking information is stored, what kind of reports are built or how student generated data is compiled. That said, SCORM remains the most common e Learning standard since most learning management systems know how to play SCORM content. Pros. Publish and play content across versatile platforms. Track course completion and time spent. Archive outdated content in a standard recognizable format. Develop basic content or sophisticated courses with high production costs. Blend content coming from multiple different sources and dont worry about technical compatibility. Cons. Infrequent updates, the latest dating back to 2. Doesnt allow elaborate reporting. Misses out on in depth analysis of user activity. Traditional SCORM content is Flash based, which may cause issues on new platforms and mobile devices. These are the key upsides and downsides of SCORM. Feel like you need to render your content in an LMS friendly format Check out this article and learn how to convert Power. Point slides into a SCORM package. Tin Can APITin Can x. API or Experience API is the successor of SCORM even ADL heavily supports x. How To Install Pycairo Example. API over the older format. Whats so special about the new standard In a nutshell, it registers learner activity and stores data for further use. To a large extent, Experience API owes its success to a feature named Learning Record Store LRS. The data gleaned by e Learning software is stored in the LRS to be later transmitted to the LMS when the user goes online. Otherwise, Tin Can does not require a permanent Internet connection or a web browser. The main goal of SCORM and Tin Can is essentially the same to keep elaborate logs of learners actions. From this perspective, x. API gives you more leeway, whereas SCORM is much more restrictive about what instructors can track. SCORM 2. 00. 4 takes care of completion, success and not much else. Meanwhile, Tin Can enables tracking and storage of information for a multitude of use scenarios, including mobile learning. Experience API is a mobile friendly e Learning format that plays back smoothly on smart phones and tablets within major content platforms and LMSs. Escultura En Piedra Parramon Pdf. API adopted all key benefits of SCORM and added some really nice features. Here are a few advantages over the older standard. Capability to view in depth assessment results. Freedom of working outside of a learning management system. Advanced portability due to LRSNo web browser required. No attachment to any specific browser based applications or Java. Script. Greater control over e Learning content.